<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Diego MSA Housing Report &#8212; Severe Supply/Demand Imblance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/</link>
	<description>Stay ahead of the housing &#38; mortgage market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 16:35:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alton Langwell</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/comment-page-1/#comment-1489</link>
		<dc:creator>Alton Langwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=213#comment-1489</guid>
		<description>I lately came across your blog and have been learning along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I lately came across your blog and have been learning along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reo service san diego</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>reo service san diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=213#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>Wow what a important analysis, shapely dot on pent-up needle. I have of a group of family who would remit directly if prices went buildup a bit.It’s amiable of dote on the cattle sell – sometimes you fitting rule essential plummet assent it’s bag to thump back unraveling. But when you take up certain keeps dropping you’re direct to commit on item rally, planate when you earlier refused to dole out at a elder price!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow what a important analysis, shapely dot on pent-up needle. I have of a group of family who would remit directly if prices went buildup a bit.It’s amiable of dote on the cattle sell – sometimes you fitting rule essential plummet assent it’s bag to thump back unraveling. But when you take up certain keeps dropping you’re direct to commit on item rally, planate when you earlier refused to dole out at a elder price!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viv</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Viv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=213#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Awesome work Mark, you keep producing gold day in, day out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome work Mark, you keep producing gold day in, day out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=213#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Great post.  

Q1:  Would you please define the &quot;low-end,&quot; &quot;middle&quot; and &quot;high-end&quot; properties in terms of the dollar value?

It appears you have five-tiers:
a.  $75,000 to $200,000;
b.  $201,000 to $400,000;
c.  $401,000 to $650,000,
d.  $651,000 to $1,000,000;
e.  $1,001,000 to  higher (not mentioned in the charts).

Q2:   Won&#039;t these tiers vary depending on the location? For example, a $425K single family residence in Orange County is different from a $425,000 SFR in Fresno.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Great post.  </p>
<p>Q1:  Would you please define the &#8220;low-end,&#8221; &#8220;middle&#8221; and &#8220;high-end&#8221; properties in terms of the dollar value?</p>
<p>It appears you have five-tiers:<br />
a.  $75,000 to $200,000;<br />
b.  $201,000 to $400,000;<br />
c.  $401,000 to $650,000,<br />
d.  $651,000 to $1,000,000;<br />
e.  $1,001,000 to  higher (not mentioned in the charts).</p>
<p>Q2:   Won&#8217;t these tiers vary depending on the location? For example, a $425K single family residence in Orange County is different from a $425,000 SFR in Fresno.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAllen</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>JAllen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=213#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Mr. Mortgage said: Mid-to-upper end housing markets will lead the downside in 2009.

My comment: Carmel Valley, Here I come!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Mortgage said: Mid-to-upper end housing markets will lead the downside in 2009.</p>
<p>My comment: Carmel Valley, Here I come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aarchan</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Aarchan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=213#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Thanks for your post.

?: Is it possible to track what is going on geographically in say Manhattan Beach to see what the foreclosure pipeline looks like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Thanks for your post.</p>
<p>?: Is it possible to track what is going on geographically in say Manhattan Beach to see what the foreclosure pipeline looks like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAllen</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>JAllen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=213#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Mr. M, Another AAA rated post! 

Q: With M2M suspended, won&#039;t banks have less desire/need to hold back shadow inventory to shore up their balance sheet?  

JAllen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. M, Another AAA rated post! </p>
<p>Q: With M2M suspended, won&#8217;t banks have less desire/need to hold back shadow inventory to shore up their balance sheet?  </p>
<p>JAllen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdbri</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>sdbri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=213#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Wow what a great analysis, excellent point on pent-up demand.  I know of a lot of people who would sell immediately if prices went up a bit.

It&#039;s kind of like the stock market - sometimes you just watch it fall thinking it&#039;s going to bounce back up.  But when you see it keeps dropping you&#039;re willing to sell on any rally, even when you earlier refused to sell at a higher price!

People with even a few percent equity are in a bind because of closing costs and commission.  Some people are worried about the economy and are actually better off taking the 12 months of free rent (and keeping it), if all they&#039;ll get from selling is breaking even at zero.  The equation has really changed for people, and I&#039;ve seen a lot of this first hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow what a great analysis, excellent point on pent-up demand.  I know of a lot of people who would sell immediately if prices went up a bit.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of like the stock market &#8211; sometimes you just watch it fall thinking it&#8217;s going to bounce back up.  But when you see it keeps dropping you&#8217;re willing to sell on any rally, even when you earlier refused to sell at a higher price!</p>
<p>People with even a few percent equity are in a bind because of closing costs and commission.  Some people are worried about the economy and are actually better off taking the 12 months of free rent (and keeping it), if all they&#8217;ll get from selling is breaking even at zero.  The equation has really changed for people, and I&#8217;ve seen a lot of this first hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarbP</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>BarbP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=213#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Hi, Mark:

Thanks for the great posts. 

One question-- I am hearing rumors here and there of the REOs never making it to the public market, but instead being sold in blocks to &quot;investors&quot;. Some rumor-age has it that these investors will not resell them, but rather rent them out.

Do you have any visibility/comments on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Mark:</p>
<p>Thanks for the great posts. </p>
<p>One question&#8211; I am hearing rumors here and there of the REOs never making it to the public market, but instead being sold in blocks to &#8220;investors&#8221;. Some rumor-age has it that these investors will not resell them, but rather rent them out.</p>
<p>Do you have any visibility/comments on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HHB</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/04/21/213/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>HHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=213#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Great post. One question though. Wouldn&#039;t it be better to say &#039;Current Value&#039; instead of &#039;Present Value&#039;? Present Value conjures up thoughts of discounting future payments at the current interest rate. 

Just a thought given the target market for your research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. One question though. Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to say &#8216;Current Value&#8217; instead of &#8216;Present Value&#8217;? Present Value conjures up thoughts of discounting future payments at the current interest rate. </p>
<p>Just a thought given the target market for your research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
