<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5-12 April Foreclosure &amp; Servicer Tracker Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/</link>
	<description>Stay ahead of the housing &#38; mortgage market</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:17:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Herb Paulding</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/comment-page-3/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb Paulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=279#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>Hi webmaster - This is by far the best looking site I’ve seen. It was completely easy to navigate and it was easy to look for the information I needed. Fantastic layout and great content! Every site should have that. Awesome job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi webmaster &#8211; This is by far the best looking site I’ve seen. It was completely easy to navigate and it was easy to look for the information I needed. Fantastic layout and great content! Every site should have that. Awesome job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chandler Mortgage</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/comment-page-3/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Chandler Mortgage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=279#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>This Post was full of great info , from where you get this info . Must be a hard work to find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Post was full of great info , from where you get this info . Must be a hard work to find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buster Nesslein</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/comment-page-3/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Buster Nesslein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 08:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=279#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>Awesome post and I genuinely like the instructions as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post and I genuinely like the instructions as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Berge</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/comment-page-2/#comment-1490</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Berge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=279#comment-1490</guid>
		<description>Hi, perhaps this post may be off topic but anyways, Having gone browsing about your web site and it looks very elegant. It is obvious that you know the subject and you are fervent about it. I am creating a new site plus I&#039;m attempting to make it look great, plus present the best quality subject matter. I have learned a good deal at this website and also I look forward to alot more posts and will be back soon. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, perhaps this post may be off topic but anyways, Having gone browsing about your web site and it looks very elegant. It is obvious that you know the subject and you are fervent about it. I am creating a new site plus I&#8217;m attempting to make it look great, plus present the best quality subject matter. I have learned a good deal at this website and also I look forward to alot more posts and will be back soon. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foreclosure</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/comment-page-2/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Foreclosure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=279#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>Very good information. Thanks for letting me know about this to help me in my foreclosure problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good information. Thanks for letting me know about this to help me in my foreclosure problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/comment-page-2/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=279#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renter</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/comment-page-2/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Renter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=279#comment-839</guid>
		<description>Chipotle,
Thanks for your comments.  I agree that on a very long-run basis, real estate moves up.  Though, if it&#039;s closer to inflation, excluding the recent years&#039; bubble pricing, it may not be much appreciation in real terms.

The key point though is what is doing the appreciation?  I believe it&#039;s the land, not the house.  The house itself is a maintenance cost and is depreciating over time.  Take for example this case: imagine two pieces of land next to each other that are exactly the same size.  Each has an identical house on it, except that one was built 40 years ago, and the other one was just built as a copy.  If they both went on the market at the same time, would you expect the property with the 40 year old house to be valued at more or less than the one with the new house on it?  If the answer is less, as I suspect it would be, then the only reason would be because newer is better, and the older has depreciated due to age (and may have higher near-term maintenance costs going forward than the new one). 

Thoughts/comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chipotle,<br />
Thanks for your comments.  I agree that on a very long-run basis, real estate moves up.  Though, if it&#8217;s closer to inflation, excluding the recent years&#8217; bubble pricing, it may not be much appreciation in real terms.</p>
<p>The key point though is what is doing the appreciation?  I believe it&#8217;s the land, not the house.  The house itself is a maintenance cost and is depreciating over time.  Take for example this case: imagine two pieces of land next to each other that are exactly the same size.  Each has an identical house on it, except that one was built 40 years ago, and the other one was just built as a copy.  If they both went on the market at the same time, would you expect the property with the 40 year old house to be valued at more or less than the one with the new house on it?  If the answer is less, as I suspect it would be, then the only reason would be because newer is better, and the older has depreciated due to age (and may have higher near-term maintenance costs going forward than the new one). </p>
<p>Thoughts/comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chipotle</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/comment-page-2/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>chipotle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=279#comment-716</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Mr. Mortgage. Is there a way to get more granular data as to Southern California, counties, and zip codes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Mr. Mortgage. Is there a way to get more granular data as to Southern California, counties, and zip codes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chipotle</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/comment-page-2/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>chipotle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=279#comment-715</guid>
		<description>Renter says:
I say: “As well it should be.” Why should a house — a rotting box of wood in the rain — be anything other than shelter, an expense. Sure the land may have some value, but the house itself is a depreciating asset that rots and needs maintenance.

I agree with most of your comments with exception to this one. Most homes across a 10, 20, 30 year period will certainly appreciate more than when it was initially bought. Sure it may fluctuate up and down throughout the years , however, across decades it will be a positively linear increase. History records of homes support this, so long as they were NOT used as ATM&#039;s.

I believe there are several places to point fingers for this whole debacle. Govt deregulation, mortgage companies/banks lienient lending, fraudulent LO&#039;s, and the consumer themselves for not doing their due dilligence understanding the loan program they actually signed their name to on the promissary note. People would think twice about walking away if it werent for mortgage debt forgiveness. http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=205004,00.html

In regards to comment 65 by Sam Sterns: 
Sure the &#039;buy-and-bail&#039; scenario makes sense for a lot of people. Yet, there are several tactics that have guideline stops in effect. You might want to look up Fraudulent terms such as straw buyers, buy and bail policies, and rent skimming. Best of luck to those that get away with it knowingly. 

PR&#039;s: When is the last time anyone remembers the IRS letting someone go tax free on income or &#039;equity&#039; in this case?? In the future, see how much $ you actually net from selling your home. There are some repercussions to PR&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renter says:<br />
I say: “As well it should be.” Why should a house — a rotting box of wood in the rain — be anything other than shelter, an expense. Sure the land may have some value, but the house itself is a depreciating asset that rots and needs maintenance.</p>
<p>I agree with most of your comments with exception to this one. Most homes across a 10, 20, 30 year period will certainly appreciate more than when it was initially bought. Sure it may fluctuate up and down throughout the years , however, across decades it will be a positively linear increase. History records of homes support this, so long as they were NOT used as ATM&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I believe there are several places to point fingers for this whole debacle. Govt deregulation, mortgage companies/banks lienient lending, fraudulent LO&#8217;s, and the consumer themselves for not doing their due dilligence understanding the loan program they actually signed their name to on the promissary note. People would think twice about walking away if it werent for mortgage debt forgiveness. <a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=205004,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=205004,00.html</a></p>
<p>In regards to comment 65 by Sam Sterns:<br />
Sure the &#8216;buy-and-bail&#8217; scenario makes sense for a lot of people. Yet, there are several tactics that have guideline stops in effect. You might want to look up Fraudulent terms such as straw buyers, buy and bail policies, and rent skimming. Best of luck to those that get away with it knowingly. </p>
<p>PR&#8217;s: When is the last time anyone remembers the IRS letting someone go tax free on income or &#8216;equity&#8217; in this case?? In the future, see how much $ you actually net from selling your home. There are some repercussions to PR&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blossom</title>
		<link>http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/2009/05/13/5-12-april-foreclosure-servicer-tracker-report/comment-page-2/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Blossom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 04:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fieldcheckgroup.com/?p=279#comment-631</guid>
		<description>Despite FTC Settlements, looks like EMC,SPS and others are up to same old Mortgage Servicing Fraud.
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0323014.shtm 
FTC v. Fairbanks/SelectPortfolioServicing 
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623031/index.shtm 
FTC v. EMC/Bear Stearns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite FTC Settlements, looks like EMC,SPS and others are up to same old Mortgage Servicing Fraud.<br />
<a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0323014.shtm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0323014.shtm</a><br />
FTC v. Fairbanks/SelectPortfolioServicing<br />
<a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623031/index.shtm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623031/index.shtm</a><br />
FTC v. EMC/Bear Stearns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
